Posts tagged as:

nature deficit disorder

Report: 90% Of Waking Hours Spent Staring At Glowing Rectangles

The rectangles even help Americans to successfully emote, often by using a combination of visual and aural signals to indicate when laughter or tears should be produced.

“Life would be very different if it weren’t for these magical squares of light,” cultural studies professor and social critic David Ostroff typed to reporters using one of his wireless messaging rectangles. “Sry. Have 2 go. Movie about 2 strt.”

On average, Americans interact with anywhere from 53 to 107 pulsating rectangles every week. For many, however, this is simply not enough. Despite having a leisure rectangle in every bedroom, along with multiple work rectangles, a rectangle just for the children, and one or two rectangles that can do the work of several rectangles in one, many citizens admit to being dissatisfied.

If Apple really wanted to be different, they would avoid building another rectangular device and do something insanely great, like give us a glowing nonagon, or a let’s get all retro and go back to the 1950′s style glowing squircles.

Have you ever measured how much time your kids are in front of all glowing rectangles? It would be an interesting experiment. I wonder if we actually did measure all of that time with TV, computers, iPods, and video games, if it would make us more likely to impose limits.

If you do come up with measurements, post them in the comments.

For my two kids, my son exceeds my daughter by a large margin. My daughter is mostly in front of her computer, while my son does a considerable amount of TV and iPod Touch staring in addition to the time he spends on the computer and it can consume an unhealthy amount of time.

{ 3 comments }

Techno Tuesday: Evolvin’ Devolvin’

by mark on April 7, 2009

Andy Rementer’s Techno Tuesday:

Techno Tuesday Cartoon

{ 0 comments }

Computer Games are Good for Kids, Parents Say (Microsoft-commissioned survey of parents). Commenter “WinTard” says,

I would agree. My kid has been playing with computers since age 1, starting with Mother Goose. It allows them to familiarize themselves with a critical tool that will be necessary for their future success in the 3rd millennium and 21st century. And it develops an interest and passion for something worthwhile.

The major source of calamity in our society is people plodding through life without direction or objectives. And idle, bored minds turn to nasty things…

How did our civilization ever prosper in the days before computers?

Why do so many parents get this so wrong? Idle, bored minds eventually turn toward imagination and creativity. Parents need to read Richard Louv and Jane Healy.

There is plenty of time for kids to acquaint themselves with technology. They don’t need a mouse shoved into their hands at one year or even five. Jane Healy, who has studied kids and computers thinks age 7 is a good time to introduce kids to computers. Young kids should be exploring the real world with all of their senses. They really don’t need the distraction of computers.

When did your kids start using computers? Do you think what they have learned will be a major factor in their success in life?

{ 2 comments }

The Only Thing We Have to Fear…

by mark on February 24, 2009

“Your kids may be in danger!” says the news media. They know fear gets people’s attention; attention let’s them sell advertising. The truth may just be less attention-grabbing.

Is the Internet a dangerous place where evil lurks and kids are at risk? Do we need to worry?

No. Probably not. Recent findings from a task force created by 49 state attorneys general suggests that parents can relax.

Report Calls Online Threats to Children Overblown. There is no significant problem after all according to the report.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal criticizes the report and insists that “Children are solicited every day online. Some fall prey and the results are tragic. That harsh reality defies the statistical academic research underlying the report.”

Actually, most of the children are being solicited online by other children, and most children that get involved with adults online are actively pursuing such activity. Statistics don’t always tell the whole story and the fear mongers will withhold details if it doesn’t serve their purpose.

The whole report can be found here: Enhancing Child Safety and Online Technologies.

Porn and violence have become more prevelent in various media, yet teens are having less sex and there is less real violence. Is there a relationship there? Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds asks, are porn and violence good for America’s children? Then he says:

Maybe the porn, and the videogames, provided catharsis, serving as substitutes for the real thing. Maybe. And maybe there’s no connection at all. (Or maybe it’s a different one — research indicates that teenagers, though safer and healthier, are also fatter — so perhaps the other improvements are the result of teens sitting around looking at porn and videogames until they’re too out-of-shape and unattractive for the real thing…) Most likely, the lesson is that — once again — correlation isn’t causation, despite policy entrepreneurs’ efforts to claim otherwise.

In another report, video games do not lead to violence.

If we can trust these reports, then kids are not at increased risk of physical harm. Good! How about other detrimental psychological effects? Does it affect their brains? They’re social skills? Will it give them ADD?

Psychologist Dr. Helen Smith asks, Do social websites harm children’s brains? Helen points to the news about a neuroscientist, Susan Greenfield, who refers to sites like Facebook, Twitter and the like and says, “My fear is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a small attention span and who live for the moment…”

Wait a minute… haven’t kids of all ages, over the past century, been attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights? Don’t all teenagers have small attention spans and live for the moment? That’s a safe bet.

But let us not be so quick to be entirely dismissive. Parents are witnesses to their kids growing up around 24/7 cartoon cable channels, Internet access, Facebook, YouTube, cell phones, and instant messaging. Many have seen that when they don’t impose limits, hell breaks loose. Raising teenagers regardless of technology is one big exercise in imposing limits.

So what’s a parent to do in the absense of a definitive study that gives us clear results on if technology is beneficial or detrimental? Set limits, of course. Make sure the kids are finding time to do all of the other things that kids should be doing. Everything in moderation. Take everything the media tells you with a grain of salt and trust your parental instincts.

Here is a smattering of additional links that I’ve collected over the past few months that I want to share, but don’t feel like addressing individually right now. Enjoy.

Digital Overload Is Frying Our Brains

More ‘Screen Time’ Linked to Poor Fitness in Girls

How the Internet Damages Our Culture

Culture Makes the Internet Cruder, Not the Other Way Around

Study links TV and depression

What are your thoughts on all of this?

{ 1 comment }

Free E-Book on Free Range Kids

by mark on February 16, 2009

Though it’s a couple of years old, I came across a free e-book about free range kids: No Fear: Growing up in a risk averse society, by Tim Gill.

This is not to be confused with the Free Range Kids blog by Lenore Skenazy, or her upcoming book called Free-Range Kids: Giving Our Children the Freedom We Had Without Going Nuts with Worry

The “No Fear” e-book was found via Instapundit.

{ 0 comments }

How old do your kids need to be before you’ll let them travel on public transportation?

My daughter just flew from JFK to Houston with a friend the same age as her: fourteen. A direct flight, with adults dropping them off at the gate and picking them up at the other end. All things considered they were extremely safe through this trip over the holidays.

When we ran into friends and relatives around the holidays who noticed she was absent, we told them she was in Texas.

“She’s in Texas? Who did she go with?”.

“With one of her classmates. They went to visit a mutual friend.”

“Oh, her friend’s family was going down too?”, with a sense of relief on their faces.

“No. Just the two of them,” I said, as I watched their eyes open wide with disbelief.

Most didn’t react that way. I often heard people say that this would be good step for her and that she would build some confidence out of the trip. The strongest disagreement with my choice seemed to come from mothers, while fathers seemed generally more supportive.

Ryan on the TrainMy father, at age 12, took a train to NYC from Connecticut with his cousin. He survived to tell the tale just fine. How did they get to the train station in New Haven or Bridgeport? They hitchhiked. They made this trip more than once.

Lenore Skenazy, was letting her son, at nine years, ride the subway in NYC, by himself. The day after Christmas this year — he is now ten years old — he got on the train, and a conductor finding him traveling alone raised an issue believing that this was not right. The police were called, but eventually, it turns out that everything was OK. The policy of the MTA, which nobody was apparently aware of, states that kids can ride along as long as they are eight and up.

The hair on my neck bristles sometimes when I hear people say, “Well, we live in different times. It’s not like it used to be,” with the assumption that the world is a more dangerous place.

But the only stats that I’ve seen have indicated that the world is getting to be a safer place for children, with rates of crime against children actually dropping.

Parents that live in fear and impose overly restrictive limits on their kids are making a terribly misinformed decision. Reality does not support the reasons that they are choosing to limit their kids experiences. Worse, they are passing their irrational fears onto their children, who will grow up wrongly believing that the world is to be feared and danger lurks everywhere.

Subway: View from the FrontWould you let your ten-year-old ride the MTA around NYC alone? When your neighborhood is NYC, then I don’t see why you wouldn’t. Some parents would probably side with people who think that Lenore is an irresponsible parent. Lenore sees that she’s giving her kids freedom, responsibility, and experiences that will serve them well in becoming adults. I side with her. I believe that the job of raising a child is one where you gradually give a kid more freedom and responsibility so that by the time their are an adult, they are well-prepared.

Nowadays, consider that kids who are likely to be traveling on airlines or subways are also outfitted with a cell phone, giving them easy access to emergency services. Such luxuries didn’t exist when my Dad traveled.  They certainly didn’t exist in the days of Ben Franklin and Davy Crockett either, who began adulthood in their early teens.

I have Lenore’s book, Free Range Kids: Giving Our Kids the Freedom We Enjoyed Without Going Nuts with Worry, on order, and I’ll be following her new blog, Free Range Kids.

Indeed, times have changed.  Unfortunately it is the parents have changed. Thank you John Walsh and the rest of the media for inciting record levels of fear amongst parents.

{ 5 comments }

Today in the Stupid Headline Department

by mark on December 29, 2008

Minister: Wii the best boost for children’s intelligence. Really?

OK, not really. But that’s what the headline says. In the lead sentence in the article, it’s clarified a bit: “CHILDREN who play computer games will do better at school than those who just sit and watch television.“.

In other news, caterpillars are more nutritious and kids prefer eating them over eating rabbit poo.

This minister claims that he has “witnessed progress” in his three-year old and he attributes it to using the computer. I wonder how this kid compares to the three-year-olds who are reading books with their parents and spending a lot more time outdoors exploring the real world.

Speaking of reading books, this MP should read FAILURE TO CONNECT: How Computers Affect Our Children’s Minds — and What We Can Do About It and Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder.

One commenter replies: “How about the children who play board games, who read and who go outside and play? Oh of course we don’t have any children like that anymore in Britain.” They sure to seem like a species nearing extinction sometimes, don’t they.

{ 0 comments }

Here in the northeastern US, it’s getting cold and holiday cheer is making its appearance. After enjoying a delicious Thanksgiving meal with family, the next big event was a weekend traveling to Vermont with a few other families for a weekend of fun, relaxation, and cutting down our Christmas tree.

Breaking away from the computer and TV was a factor in what made the weekend so special. It started with a three-hour drive. The kids were excited in anticipation of seeing everybody, playing games, going places. Finding a radio station that was playing Christmas music enhanced the mood. The drive was a great time to talk about things and tell stories. Hitting the Vermont border, the first snow of the season appeared and the kids cheered.

Admittedly, there was some iPod and Nintendo DS usage in the back seat, because nobody can talk for three hours straight. Pointing out scenic or unusual sites, like the “Moose Crossing” sign, the covered bridge or the river that is starting to freeze over got them to pause their toys and got a little more conversation going.

At the house, hanging out with relatives and friends, away from cell phone signals, video games and the Internet, everybody gives attention to everybody else for a change. The fire crackles. Older generations tell stories to the younger generations. The kids crack up the parents and grandparents with their funny insights on things.

The next day, the hunt for the tree begins. The field is full of adequate trees, but the perfect one is out there. The evergreens and fresh cut pine smells terrific, and sometimes the smoke from a not-to-distant chimney. Shuffling into position to cut the tree down, a variety little “stickers” grab onto fleece jackets and gloves. While the tree is being bailed, hot chocolate warms everybody’s hands, noses, lips and bellies. Who doesn’t appreciate hot chocolate more after an hour in the cold, winter sun. All of this adds up to a great weekend of family and fun.

Families that have an artificial tree miss out on most of that fun. Getting the tree becomes a half-hour event with a trip to the basement or attic. The kids get to open a box of tree parts. Sure, it’s better than no tree, and it’s still an occasion to set it up. But it doesn’t tingle the senses with all of those outdoor experiences.

Artificial trees may be convenient, but they eliminate the sights, sounds, smells, and tastes that go along with the adventure of getting a real tree.

Real trees are to artificial trees

…the way that meeting friends in the outdoors is to IM’ing them.

…the way that sledding and snowball fights are to World of Warcraft online.

…the way that chestnuts roasting on an open fire are to watching YouTube videos of chestnuts roasting on an open fire.

Make sure that however you enjoy your holidays that it is safe, fun, and make some great memories!

Update: I created a Christmas tree related poll.

{ 3 comments }